2-min. read

Clarifying the Conversation around i-Ready

By:

Ty Holmes joins The Education Gadfly Show to explore i-Ready's role in classroom instruction and why purposeful use matters more than the tools themselves.
A smiling student works at her desk while classmates write nearby in the classroom.

On a recent episode of The Education Gadfly Show, I joined Fordham Institute President Mike Petrilli and National Research Director David Griffith to explore the growing national conversation around educational technology—including i-Ready—and what it means for students, teachers, and families.

Which Part of i-Ready Are We Talking About?

One thing that stuck with me is that there’s a lot of confusion about what i-Ready is and isn’t. For one, i-Ready isn't a single product. Curriculum Associates built it as a coherent system with distinct parts:

  • i-Ready Inform, a K–12 adaptive reading and math assessment given three times a year to identify what each student knows and needs, and to measure their progress. Within the actionable data reports, there are teacher-led, printable instructional resources directly tied to what the assessment reveals about student needs, helping teachers fill in key concepts from prior grades as well as extend learning.
  • i-Ready Personalized Instruction, a supplemental, student-paced online component for Grades K–8 that addresses each student’s specific learning needs based on insights from i‑Ready Inform, so teachers can adjust instruction as needed.

We also publish print-based, teacher-led, core curriculum programs, including i-Ready Classroom Mathematics for Grades K–Algebra 1 and Magnetic Literacy for Grades K–6, as well as supplemental resources like Ready Mathematics, Ready Reading, and Ready Writing. Our products were built with coherence as a connected system designed to work together to help teachers improve student outcomes.

As I told Mike and David, part of the confusion is on us: we gave a lot of related products very similar names. When someone says, “my kid is on i-Ready,” the question is: which part? The pieces aren't interchangeable, and they're not used the same way.

Unlike our print-based core curriculum that’s used daily as the centerpiece of instruction, i-Ready Personalized Instruction is designed for short, targeted use to support teacher-led Tier 1 instruction. Our guidance to districts has been consistent: 30 to 49 minutes per subject per week. Typical use runs closer to the low end of that, with the vast majority of students in Grades K–5 using it for around 30 minutes a week. It's meant to complement teacher-led, small group instruction, not replace it, filling in specific gaps a student needs so they can fully participate in grade-level instruction. It also allows students to practice and reinforce concepts taught in class or get the challenge they need when they're ready to go further.

When Parents Ask “Is My Kid on i-Ready Too Much?”

As we touched on in the podcast, families are increasingly asking how much time their child spends on technology during the school day, and, more importantly, why. Research shows that family involvement in a student’s education contributes to their growth, so it’s a practice we both encourage and support. When teachers receive questions about technology from families, those questions often stem from real concerns about screen time elsewhere in a child's life, even though time spent on an instructional tool isn't the same kind of screen time as entertainment or social media.

When a parent asks, "Is my kid on i-Ready too much?", it's an opening for a more informed conversation around a few key things:

  • What does that student's data tell you and how will you use it?

    It's helpful to walk families through the specific strengths and opportunities the data reveals and explain how those insights shape the instruction and support planned for their child.

  • What support will that student receive?

    Explain the big picture: small groups, whole class instruction, and any other support. Show how i-Ready Personalized Instruction fits into that broader plan as one piece of it, not a separate program running alongside it, and how it provides a coherent experience that tailors lessons to exactly what that student needs so the rest of instruction can build on it.

  • How does this tie in with grade-level expectations?
    Help families understand the learning expectations for the grade and how not all students will arrive there in the same way. A student might be ahead in one area and behind in another—something a single whole class check-in won't catch. Explain how online lessons can help students close specific skill gaps or offer challenges while their classmates catch up.

Teachers Remain at the Center

With i-Ready—no matter which component we’re talking about—teachers remain at the center. While technology is one of many tools educators use to support student learning, teachers are making the instructional decisions, building relationships with their students, and providing the guidance that drives meaningful learning. Technology’s role in classroom instruction should be to strengthen those efforts by helping teachers better understand where their students need support and by providing additional opportunities for remediation, practice, or extension when appropriate. It should never replace a teacher.

Purpose Matters

The most important question isn’t whether technology belongs in classrooms. It’s whether every tool serves a clear educational purpose.

When technology helps teachers identify unfinished learning, personalize instruction, or better understand student progress, it can become one component of a thoughtful instructional approach. Like any classroom resource, its impact depends on how it’s implemented.

Continuing the Conversation

As education continues to evolve, thoughtful dialogue between educators, families, and school leaders remains essential. Teachers are at the center of instruction. By focusing on the purpose, implementation, and evidence behind instructional resources, schools can continue supporting student learning while addressing questions families are asking.

For more, check out my full conversation on The Education Gadfly Show.

Subscribe to Our Blog

More Resources for You:

Screen Time in Schools: It's Right to Ask Questions  

Purposeful Screen Time in Schools: A Framework for District Leaders  

The Screen Time Question I Can’t Stop Asking as a Father and an EdTech Exec 

From Fragmentation to Focus: Designing for Coherence in Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

 


Loading component...