
Clarifying the Conversation around i-Ready
2-min. read
2-min. read
By: Tyrone Holmes

On a recent episode of The Education Gadfly Show, I joined Fordham Institute President Mike Petrilli and National Research Director David Griffith to explore the growing national conversation around educational technology—including i-Ready—and what it means for students, teachers, and families.
One thing that stuck with me is that there’s a lot of confusion about what i-Ready is and isn’t. For one, i-Ready isn't a single product. Curriculum Associates built it as a coherent system with distinct parts:
We also publish print-based, teacher-led, core curriculum programs, including i-Ready Classroom Mathematics for Grades K–Algebra 1 and Magnetic Literacy for Grades K–6, as well as supplemental resources like Ready Mathematics, Ready Reading, and Ready Writing. Our products were built with coherence as a connected system designed to work together to help teachers improve student outcomes.
As I told Mike and David, part of the confusion is on us: we gave a lot of related products very similar names. When someone says, “my kid is on i-Ready,” the question is: which part? The pieces aren't interchangeable, and they're not used the same way.
Unlike our print-based core curriculum that’s used daily as the centerpiece of instruction, i-Ready Personalized Instruction is designed for short, targeted use to support teacher-led Tier 1 instruction. Our guidance to districts has been consistent: 30 to 49 minutes per subject per week. Typical use runs closer to the low end of that, with the vast majority of students in Grades K–5 using it for around 30 minutes a week. It's meant to complement teacher-led, small group instruction, not replace it, filling in specific gaps a student needs so they can fully participate in grade-level instruction. It also allows students to practice and reinforce concepts taught in class or get the challenge they need when they're ready to go further.
As we touched on in the podcast, families are increasingly asking how much time their child spends on technology during the school day, and, more importantly, why. Research shows that family involvement in a student’s education contributes to their growth, so it’s a practice we both encourage and support. When teachers receive questions about technology from families, those questions often stem from real concerns about screen time elsewhere in a child's life, even though time spent on an instructional tool isn't the same kind of screen time as entertainment or social media.
When a parent asks, "Is my kid on i-Ready too much?", it's an opening for a more informed conversation around a few key things:
It's helpful to walk families through the specific strengths and opportunities the data reveals and explain how those insights shape the instruction and support planned for their child.
Explain the big picture: small groups, whole class instruction, and any other support. Show how i-Ready Personalized Instruction fits into that broader plan as one piece of it, not a separate program running alongside it, and how it provides a coherent experience that tailors lessons to exactly what that student needs so the rest of instruction can build on it.
With i-Ready—no matter which component we’re talking about—teachers remain at the center. While technology is one of many tools educators use to support student learning, teachers are making the instructional decisions, building relationships with their students, and providing the guidance that drives meaningful learning. Technology’s role in classroom instruction should be to strengthen those efforts by helping teachers better understand where their students need support and by providing additional opportunities for remediation, practice, or extension when appropriate. It should never replace a teacher.
The most important question isn’t whether technology belongs in classrooms. It’s whether every tool serves a clear educational purpose.
When technology helps teachers identify unfinished learning, personalize instruction, or better understand student progress, it can become one component of a thoughtful instructional approach. Like any classroom resource, its impact depends on how it’s implemented.
As education continues to evolve, thoughtful dialogue between educators, families, and school leaders remains essential. Teachers are at the center of instruction. By focusing on the purpose, implementation, and evidence behind instructional resources, schools can continue supporting student learning while addressing questions families are asking.
For more, check out my full conversation on The Education Gadfly Show.
Subscribe to Our BlogMore Resources for You:
Screen Time in Schools: It's Right to Ask Questions
Purposeful Screen Time in Schools: A Framework for District Leaders
The Screen Time Question I Can’t Stop Asking as a Father and an EdTech Exec
From Fragmentation to Focus: Designing for Coherence in Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

2-min. read
3-min. read
4-min. read